In the Pipeline
by Clay Risen
It's called mission creep, and it's defined America's
military policy since Vietnam. Don't get involved, we learned, unless there is
a clear purpose and plan of attack. Then get in and get out. It's why the United States cut
things short in Iraq, why it left Somalia and stayed out of Bosnia
altogether. Avoiding it is the core of the Powell Doctrine. And it's about to get us
into deep trouble in Colombia.
In early 2001 the Clinton administration approved the $1 billion Plan Colombia, an aid
package designed to give Andres Pastrana's government the military and economic tools it
needed to fight the drug trade. Many in Congress worried that the
money, like previous US aid disbursements, would be filtered into the coffers of
right-wing paramilitaries, which are openly supported by members of the Colombian
armed forces. At the same time, there was concern that the money and equipment would
be used to re-ignite the then-smoldering conflict between the government and left-wing
guerrillas. The plan went through despite opposition, and now, a year later, it has
had zero impact
on the situation no drop in cocaine exports, no increased
performance by anti-drug units, no end to the violence that has wracked the
country for decades.
A few years ago, this might have been a signal to American planners that beefing up
Plan Colombia might lead to mission creep. But that was before Sept. 11. Now, with the
United States officially at war with terrorism, the Bush administration has requested
$500 million more in aid the largest single-year disbursement to Colombia and
almost double the amount the administration pledged to rebuild Afghanistan. The majority
of that money would go to training and equipping two counterdrug brigades to
support defoliation efforts in southern Colombia.
But $98 million is set aside for a third brigade, which would defend an oil pipeline
decidedly not counter-narcotics. The Caño Limón-Coveñas pipeline, which is owned and
operated by Occidental Petroleum,
was attacked by guerrillas 166 times in 2001, and
runs through a part of the country not even remotely close to the coca fields of
counterdrug concerns.
Rather, the Bush administration defends its allocation by describing the pipeline as
a major part of the Colombian economy; Secretary of State Colin Powell told a
Congressional hearing that "what makes this pipeline unique is that it is such a major
source of income … and without this pipeline operating something close to its capacity,
it is not just a military problem; it is a serious problem with respect to the economy
of the country."
Others defend the pipeline as an element of US
national security. US Ambassador
to Colombia Anne Patterson told MSNBC that "Colombia has the potential to export more
oil to the United States, and now more than ever it's important for us to diversify
our sources of oil," this even though Colombia exports only 600,000 barrels a day to
the United States, or 2 percent of our imports.
All this the importance of the pipeline to the Colombian economy, the need to
diversify America's oil imports may be true, but the whole thing still stinks of
mission creep. So far there's no plan to send in US troops, just supplies and
trainers. But Pastrana's likely successor is Alvaro Uribe, an independent hardliner
who is already calling for more direct US involvement, and there's no reason to
believe that he won't lobby hard for troop deployment at some point.
Until now the United States has maintained a steady, if artificial, bifurcation in its
aid policy as a means to avoid mission creep all money, training and equipment must
go toward counterdrug efforts, and nothing else. And while this belied the (at times paradoxical)
tight-knit
relationship between Colombia's drug kingpins, its right-wing paramilitaries and its
left-wing insurgents, it did prevent us from going in too deep. But by defending the
Caño Limón-Coveñas pipeline, the Bush administration has removed that barrier and made
it more likely than ever that the United States will get drawn into the Colombian
conflict.
E-mail Clay Risen at risenc@yahoo.com.