The Moussaoui Show
by Clay Risen
First as tragedy, then as farce, the pretrial activity surrounding Zacarias
Moussaoui, the alleged "20th hijacker," has been dominated by the defendant's
incoherent anti-America rants and absurd, barely legible court
motions. He has
refused to
enter a plea, accused the judge of "preparing him for the gas chamber" and asserted his hatred of Jews and the United States not
particularly advisable for someone who also asserts he had nothing to do with Sept.
11. Sadly, what could have been a source of
closure and valuable information for a country still healing from
catastrophe is on the verge of collapsing before it even begins.
Appearing in front of District Judge Leonie Brinkema, he has taken to scrawling
"Zacarias Moussaoui Muslim vs. United States Godless Government" at the top of such
documents as "Remove Federal Public Defender from any Activity in
this Case Because of their Conspiracy to Kill Me and their Ineffective Assistance.
As well as any Government Court Appointed Lawyer" and "Compel the Government to
Withdraw the Charge Against Me Because the FBI were Conducting an Undercover
Surveillance Operation."
He has fired his court-appointed lawyers. He demands the right to represent himself,
but then derides Judge Brinkema for not allowing Charles Freeman, a Houston lawyer,
to represent him even though Freeman, who has already advised Moussaoui on
several occasions, refuses to submit documents necessary to allow him as
representation. Moussaoui even demanded that the trial be moved to Denver,
where there are fewer government employees and where he says the fresh air would
allow jurors to think more clearly.
Before the pretrial activity got under way, there was significant speculation that
Moussaoui was mentally unable to stand trial, let alone represent himself. And while
against his repeated objections he was eventually deemed competent,
observers of his legal antics wouldn't be too wrong in doubting whether the
court-appointed psychologists weren't a bit off their mark. Taken out of context, his
courtroom behavior is a riot.
It would be inappropriate of the media to make light of Moussaoui's errant tactics,
and there's a good reason why they've been relegated to the inside pages. Moussaoui
wants nothing more than to turn his trial into a soapbox, and through statements
like "The curse of Allah is and Be on you U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema" to
make it seem to Muslims worldwide that the United States is virulently anti-Islam.
Judge Brinkema has been particularly deft in deflating his efforts (for instance,
preventing him from entering a "no contest" plea, which would have effectively
convicted him), but there is still the risk that what seems like buffoonery to us
writing "slave to Allah" above his signature or accusing anyone and everyone
of being a "Jewish zealot" will appear more like a valiant struggle toward
martyrdom by masses that, despite global exports of "Law and Order," are less familiar
with the American legal system.
Nevertheless, there is a very good reason not to dismiss Moussaoui's actions as
simply crazed ramblings or naïve appeals to anti-American sentiment. Indeed, anyone
interested in the mindset of the Sept. 11 attackers would do well to follow the case
closely. Assuming that Moussaoui was, in fact, intended to be the 20th hijacker (and
the evidence is pretty good), we can see in his every motion, every courtroom
outburst, the sort of calculated insanity that must have undergirded the planning and
execution of the attack.
Moussaoui may be a fool, but he's no idiot over the
last few months he has quickly learned the basics of the American legal system,
with the help of Freeman crafting
motions that are, though in their content ridiculous, in their form acceptable. He is
fluent in French and Arabic, and more or less fluent in English. Like the 19 hijackers
who died on Sept. 11, he is well educated and relatively well traveled, having exhibiting an
eagerness to see the world and a proclivity for alcohol, women and partying before
conversion to strict Islam.
In this light, Moussaoui is a perfect example of a type the world has grown to know
all too well: the intelligent fanatic, someone who has learned what the secular world
has to offer and thrn rejected it in favor of a virulent, exclusive ideology. Heinrich
Himmler stocked the SS with just these sorts, men with advanced degrees and professional
standing; he knew that once converted to the Nazi cause they would offer
its most coherent defense and, comprehending it on a deeper level than most, were the
least likely to stray.
Moussaoui, like Himmler's SS officers, is so thoroughly convinced of his beliefs that
he feels anything and anyone that doesn't accord with them must be
destroyed. Already in
prison on Sept. 11, he is said to have cheered wildly at pictures of the twin towers
aflame. He sees his trial as his last attempt to strike against the United States.
He is blinded, yet resourceful, rejecting the American legal system but at the same
time using it to his own ends, much in the same way Mohammed Atta and others are said
to have navigated southern Florida culture almost unnoticed.
When Americans think of fundamentalism, whether it be the homegrown
militia/anti-abortion type or the anti-American Islamic variety, they tend to picture
uneducated, unwashed
mendicants with little going for them than the hope of martyrdom. Yet the reality is often
different look no further than the average Palestinian suicide bomber, increasingly
university educated and middle class. In most cases, fanatics tend to have sampled the
world outside their ideological purview and rejected it (or, in the case of many
Palestinians, been rejected by it). It is a typology that is often hard to explain,
and even harder to translate into post-mortem newspaper profiles. But by paying close
attention to the Moussaoui trial, we are afforded a rare insight one that, if
we hope to avoid future Sept. 11s, we would be unwise to ignore.
E-mail Clay Risen at risenc@yahoo.com.