Career Frist, Constituents Last
by Clay Risen
The scene: The auditorium of Nashville's prestigious Montgomery Bell Academy,
November 1994. A young man in khaki pants and a flannel shirt runs out waving
an enormous Tennessee state flag; the assembled students cheer. The headmaster then
comes to the podium for a few brief remarks, introducing the day's special guest.
When he's done, the crowd goes wild as Senator-elect Bill Frist, a 1970 graduate
of the school, walks onstage.
The scene was repeated throughout the city that week. Frist, a political novice but
also the scion of one of the city's wealthiest families, had just unseated Democrat
Jim Sasser, a three-term senator set to assume leadership of his party; painting
Sasser as a tax-and-spend Washington insider, Frist trounced him by 14 percentage points. The
brilliance of Frist's campaign was to hide his political inexperience by constantly
attacking his opponent's record, all the while emphasizing his career as an accomplished
surgeon and the city's latest favorite son. It worked while the students'
affection for Frist wasn't surprising, that the entire state felt much the same
way was a resounding testament to his ability to hammer home an image that trumped
his campaign's lack of substance.
Eight years later, Frist has again vaulted over the heads of more experienced
politicians, positioning himself to take over the senate majority leader
spot vacated by Trent Lott. And yet despite his newfound prominence,
what most people know about Frist is in the form of sound bites: the Senate's only
physician, a moderate Republican, a guy who can get things done. It's an image that
Frist has worked very, very hard to project. And yet like his 1994 campaign, his
Senate career writ large is a study in image over substance though this time
he is downplaying not a lack of experience but rather a conservative, pro-big business
record.
In one of the few analyses of Frist thus far, Slate's William Saletan praises the senator for
understanding the need to compromise on controversial issues to get
through key legislation. Saletan highlights Frist's work to approve restricted
stem-cell research and funding to fight AIDS in Africa; on both issues Frist was
seen as promoting a middle ground between what he wanted and what knew he could
expect, accepting less in the knowledge that he was at least getting people to
talk about the issues at hand. Compromise, Saletan writes, is "a big part of the
job of a Senate majority leader. Frist is pretty good at it."
But Saletan's glass-half-full take on Frist is naïve given the rest of the
senator's record, there's no reason to believe that his work on AIDS or stem-cell
research are anything more than calculated efforts to paint himself as moderate.
He took care to emphasize that the AIDS money was specifically aimed at HIV-positive
mothers (and not gays or drug users), and his stem-cell proposal limited
research to existing lines thereby averting criticism from the Christian right.
And soon thereafter, Frist announced his opposition to research cloning, a move
that won him praise from the pro-life movement. In both cases, Frist floated
generally palatable proposals to bulk up his centrist Republican image, at the
same time making sure that neither bill did anything to anger his core
constituencies.
That one of his other core constituencies is big business the drug and
hospital industries in particular is hardly unusual for a Republican
senator, but it may come as a shock to those who have bought into the idea that
as a physician, Frist is ipso facto concerned with improving the health and
quality of life of everyday Americans. Like most Republican senators
but unlike most public health officials Frist opposed extending the
USDA's meat-inspection authority, and he supported the Bingaman Amendment to the
Safe Drinking Water Act, which relieved mining companies of a requirement to
make sure their operations didn't contaminate local water supplies. Frist also
sponsored legislation that
would severely limit the rights of parents to sue drug
manufacturers if their children are injured by thimerosal, a mercury-based vaccine
ingredient (the legislation, included in Frist's Improved Vaccine Affordability bill, was
separate from a similar restriction included in the Homeland Security Act).
In return, the health industries have awarded him nicely in 2000
he was named the Biotechnology Industry Association's Legislator of the
Year. They have rewarded him financially as well according to
TomPaine.
com, Frist has received more than $2 million in campaign funds from
the health care industry alone. At the same time, Frist repeatedly receives
0 percent scorecards from citizen groups like the League of Conservation
Voters and Public Citizen.
Frist's record on tobacco is particularly jarring,
given that most people know him as the only senator to resuscitate
stroke victims in the Capitol hallways. During his career he has accepted
more than $50,000 from the tobacco industry, and as the head of the Republican National
Senatorial Committee has accepted another $2.2 million for the party. Public
Citizen gives Frist only a 13 percent rating on tobacco-industry legislation,
the eighth-worst in the Senate. Writing in the October 1998 issue of
Archives
of Surgery, retired surgeon Clifford Straehly wrote that because of
Frist's coziness with the tobacco lobby, "In my opinion,
Dr. Frist has betrayed the ideals of his profession and does not merit the
support of our profession in his question for reelection."
Granted, Frist's record shouldn't condemn him it is, after all,
representative of that ubiquitous category of politicians: the rank-and-file,
party-line senator. And yet it runs strikingly against his moderate and
independently minded image, an image that has less basis in reality
the more one examines his voting history. His Senate record is emblematic
of his political career all image, no substance. Having a physician
at the helm of the Republican party may strike some as a positive step in
the wake of the Lott debacle, but when that physician has a record of
repeatedly putting the interests of big business ahead of his constituents,
one has to wonder just where the party thinks it is going.
E-mail Clay Risen at risenc@yahoo.com.