
Forgetting Armenia
by Jonathan Linder
April is disconcertingly full of remembrance.
In April, the world gathered to remember the Holocaust.
With less fanfare, the 87th anniversary of the beginning of the
Armenian genocide, during which the Ottoman Turks killed 1.5 million people,
passed on April 24. April also marks the eighth anniversary of the
worst genocide of the last
half century the systematic execution of 800,000 Tutsis and 1,000
moderate Hutus in Rwanda.
Before he began the slaughter of European Jews and other peoples who
did not fit his master race, Adolf Hitler infamously asked, "Who
remembers the Armenians now?" The continued existence of acts of systematic
extermination be they
genocide, politicide or other such massacres are painful reminders that
the world still does not remember the Armenians. The organization Prevent Genocide
International maintains a table devoted to the tracking of genocides, politicides and
other political murders
since World War II. It counted 19 countries in the "extermination"
stage of the eight stages of genocide as 2002 began. More
disturbing is the multitude of nations that fall in the
planning stages of such awful acts, including Lebanon, Laos and Uzbekistan (here planning
means that mass killings have yet to occur, but that conditions exist
to make them possible).
In this context, cries of "never again" ring hollow.
While the reminders are tragic, they should not be taken as a sign
that nothing can be done, that genocide is somehow a permanent facet of
humanity's existence.
In places like the former Yugoslavia, international intervention worked
to slow and eventually halt genocidal massacres. But even there, the
international community did not act until the horrible events were
already well underway. A pre-emptive diplomatic and humanitarian
intervention in such burgeoning conflict zones as Cambodia, Tibet and
Venezuela could save far more lives and go further
toward creating a lasting peace.
The first step may be to recognize and learn from the plight of the
Armenians. In 1915, the Ottomans began a precision execution of Armenians
within Ottoman territory that was frighteningly similar to the Nazis' systematic
annihilation 25 years later. As Russian forces began a World War I
progression into the Ottoman Empire, the Turks, fearing disloyalty, decided to
disarm the Armenian soldiers
among their troops and place them in labor camps before murdering
them.
Next, Armenian intellectuals and religious leaders were rounded up and
killed, followed by house-by-house searches and forced death marches
through the desert. Armenians who were not massacred were deported in droves
about 1 million were sent to Syria, where many died from starvation.
In 1918, Ottoman forces moved through East Armenia, Azerbaijan and the
Russian Caucasus, massacring Armenians along the way.
The genocide continued after World War I concluded, and, according to
the Armenian National Institute, "by 1923 the entire landmass of Asia
Minor and historic West Armenia had been expunged of its Armenian
population. The destruction of the Armenian communities in this part of the
world was total."
Yet neither the Ottoman Turks, nor the Turkish Republic that Ataturk
founded in 1923, has ever acknowledged the slaughter. The
nation's official line to this day is that any Armenians who died were
assisting the Russians and were killed in self defense to call
it genocide is considered insidious propaganda.
Turkey's strategic position and stature as a member of
NATO has allowed this self-imposed amnesia to go unchecked, and Turkey has aggresively countered
any move to recognize the tragedy. Last year, French President
Jacques Chirac signed a bill qualifying
the Turkish massacre of the Armenians as genocide. According to The
Economist, Turkey countered by recalling its ambassador and
canceling a $205 million deal with a French company to modernize 80 military
aircraft. Turkey's foreign minister, Ismail Cem, called the French
declaration "postmodern fascism, anti-Muslim and anti-Turkish."
In the 54 years since the United Nations defined the act of genocide,
the only US president who has ever called Ottoman’s actions against
the Armenians genocide is Ronald Reagan, though every president since
Jimmy Carter has acknowledged the massacre. A measure similar to the
French bill nearly made it through the House of Representatives in October 2000, but
President Bill Clinton, fearful of upsetting his NATO ally, coerced the
House into backing down.
Incidents of communal violence throughout the world make the grim
yearly rememberances of the Holocaust, the Armenian and Rwandan genocides
all the more difficult to bear. In the Indian province of Gujarat,
communal violence between Hindus and Muslims in recent months has claimed
more than 800 lives. According to the BBC, the British government has
stated publicly that it believes the violence has been sanctioned by the
state and that it constitutes genocidal acts. From Muslim-Christian
violence on Indonesia's Molucca Islands, to the plight of the Kurds in
Iraq and Turkey, to the continuation of inter-ethnic massacres in the
Great Lakes region of Africa the world continues to suffer from the blight
of genocide.
Perhaps someday the anniversaries of the Holocaust and the Armenian and
Rwandan genocides can be a historical memory of what will truly never
happen again, instead of a reminder of what has been and what still is.
E-mail Jonathan Linder at jglinder at yahoo dot com.