
An e-mail sent by Noam Chomsky that I mistakenly received
It's almost cliche to point out that Noam Chomsky, linguist, is not to
be confused with Noam Chomsky, political thinker. You can read all
about Chomsky Normal Form without knowing that the man behind the
theory is considered one of America's major dissidents. Conversely,
most of the lefties who flock to his non-classroom lectures don't know
anaphora from cyclic phonology.
If you were already having trouble keeping the two Chomskys straight,
then you probably aren't looking forward to his latest work, "An
E-mail Sent by Noam Chomsky that I Mistakenly Received." Part prose
poem, part novella, "An E-mail" goes for exquisite understatement
where his past works have made bold pronouncements, and utter
head-scratching confusion where his past works have made coherent
sense. It also establishes him as a major misdirected-e-mail-writing
talent independent of his other divergent intellectual identities.
What follows are a few excerpts from "An E-mail."
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 22:14:25 -0500
From: Noam Chomsky
To: chomsky@MIT.EDU
Chomsky is so beloved, some say, because of the way he makes us
reassess our assumptions. This intro, then, is echt Chomsky.
Obviously, I'm not Noam Chomsky. But then, how did I get this e-mail,
if it was only sent to Noam Chomsky? This leaves open the possibility
that I really am Noam Chomsky.
I'm returning the hardcopy backup, and am also forwarding this letter
to myself since I want to save it -- mention it just so that you won't
be confused.
So, is "myself" here really "myself", that is "Noam Chomsky"?
Obviously, the reference to being confused is a knowing mockery of the
befuddlement Chomsky is inflicting on receivers of this e-mail.
EM = e-mail. * = already sent; ** = dump; */** already sent AND
dump; *** = file; ? = check with me; ??? = "can you take care of
this"; ( = will answer later; ~ = dump with no response. # =
initial and send without signature. % = run off for me, no need
to file. $ = Hold on to it for a bit and if they don't respond,
dump. FORM = form letter and dump. FS = form.sum = temporary
form letter for summer (dump)
Notice how economical and compact Chomsky's code is here. The fact
that "*/**" means something altogether different from "***" is worth
noting; in the universe Chomsky has created with this e-mail, one and
two do not always equal three.
@letter
Dear Senator Feingold,
Thank you very much for sending me the information on your
efforts to terminate the death penalty, which I have been
following with great interest and appreciation. It is a form of
barbarism that should not be tolerated in a civilized society,
and I hope your work meets with success.
Won't argue here.
You asked whether the address you had for me is correct. It is.
@closing Sincerely,
Even in the overtly political sections of "An E-mail," Chomsky makes
sly reference to the main theme, that of misdirected mail.
 |
|
 |
Unless you subscribe to the intentional fallacy, you know that the
true power of any work lies not in what its artist may intend, but in
the effect it has on its audience. "An E-mail Sent By Noam Chomsky
That I Mistakenly Received" is no exception. It caused an immediate
grassroots response in the Noam-Chomsky-e-mail-receiving community,
and even outsiders were drawn into the critical debate. "Did you get
the Chomsky e-mail?" one member would ask another. "I got it on my
Athena account but not my media account." "I got two copies." "What
mailing lists are both of us on?" Chomsky, who has long cautioned
against the effects of centralized corporate control of the Internet,
has taken his conviction out of the realm of dry discourse and into
that of organic populist absurdity.
Pop culture, that is, the set of cultural phenomena that capture the
popular imagination, is said by many media theorists to be more
subversive than mass culture, which is simply culture intended for
mass consumption. Chomsky, with his "An E-mail", shows that pop
e-mail (not to mention POP e-mail) is indeed more subversive than mass
e-mail. Its infectious spread far outdoes any corporate
self-promoter's notion of "viral marketing."
An assistant of Chomsky's had only this to say about the massive
critical outpouring:
We have solved the mystery - Noam keyboard trigger finger had gone wild
last Friday, but is now under control.
Bev Stohl
Asst. to Noam Chomsky
Julia Lipman (julia@flakmag.com)
graphic by Matthew Forsythe