
Vanilla Sky
dir. Cameron Crowe
Paramount Pictures
Let's talk about failure. Because failure, at its best, can be a delirious
proposition in entertainment. Witness A.I., which
was a box office and, perhaps by Speilberg's standards, a critical failure. The
film's final hour is an unfortunate mess, and the final half hour of this
hour, with its myriad false endings, is bad to the point of insult. But
that first hour: magic. A noble, risky attempt, all and all, and a failure.
Noble failures abound: the final season of "Twin Peaks"; Weezer's second
album, Pinkerton. Some people think that most of Shakespeare's "romance"
plays, like "Cymbeline" and "The Tempest," are noble failures, overlong and
indulgent but, as always, transcendent just when you've given up hope.
Vanilla Sky is not a noble failure. Nor, despite some of its pomo
stylings, is it a risky failure. It's safe, it's too long, it's badly
written, mostly badly acted, and, worst of all, its message is either
incomprehensible or commonplace it's a boring failure. It's Cameron Crowe's worst movie by such an
almost unfathomably wide margin.
The story? Something to do with arrogance and materialism and the deadening
effect of pop culture on the collective brainpan. Cruise plays David Aames, a
self-satisfied and juvenile heir to a magazine empire locked
in a battle of wills with his frosty board of directors, who want him
squeezed out. He has a "fuck buddy," Julie Gianni (Cameron Diaz), whom he
callously leaves off the guest list for his 33rd birthday party. She attends
anyway, but his attentions are all on Sofia Serrano (Penelope Cruz), mainly
because he has decided (moments after seeing her) that she is "the last
guileless person in New York City."
David and Sofia spend a platonic night together at Sofia's apartment,
spooning on the couch and drawing pictures of each other, and this looks
like love, folks, but the next morning the increasingly psycho Julie shows
up outside Sofia's and offers David both a ride and a quickie. And off they go. You can
guess what comes next; you've seen the trailer.
There is plenty of ado after the car ride of destiny/doom, much of it having
to do with Aames' redemption after a life of
callous disregard for others; the darkness of desire and its connection to
fate; fear of death; beauty as fetish; and the relation of dreams and the
unconscious to our lives. All interesting ideas, and they're thrown into
Vanilla Sky's soup and left to float there. The audience's task is to poke
at these ideas and relate them to the journey of this cocky and unlikable
man. "I feel like I've been here for eight years," a man behind me said
during the credits. Either he was bored blind, or had exhausted substantial
energy puzzling the various themes of the film. Which do you think it was?
The ending is ostensibly a surprise, but there are much greater surprises in
Vanilla Sky. One: Penelope Cruz is still being aggressively sold to us,
despite her lack of whatever charm/magnetism she might evince when allowed to
speak in her native tongue. In this film, as in Blow and Captain Corelli's
Mandolin, she reveals herself as a beautiful, empty vessel. A Spanish Ali
MacGraw. She is Vanilla Sky: The Actress. Two: Cameron Crowe is
responsible for the dialogue in this film, which drops from the character's
mouths like lead hiccups. It spoils nothing to report that Cameron Diaz
exclaims, at a critical point in the film, "I swallowed your come! That
means something!" Cameron Crowe's singular gift is crafting dialogue. Rent
any of his well-made films, like Say Anything and Almost Famous, and you'll
bear witness to Crowe's ability to mimic the rhythms of everyday speech.
Even in his less adept outings, like Singles, there are tremendous moments
between characters that are possible only because the dialogue is so strong
the first-date nervous chatter between Campbell Scott and Kyra
Sedgwick, the hilariously sung messages Matt Dillon leaves on his
ex's answering machine. The latter is a funny and sweet
mea culpa, and only Crowe could imagine it. But, amazingly, there's not
a single moment in Vanilla Sky in which the actors didn't sound hollow.
The biggest surprise is Cruise. As a producer on the film, he must be held
accountable for agreeing to this script, making the film and releasing it
in its current state. Because there is no visible reason why Vanilla Sky
should have been made. David Aames is not a character of merit or interest,
no matter what metaphysical hoops he is forced through. The story's muddled
incoherence is not a sign of deeper subtextual meaning. This movie that
traffics in nearly a dozen themes is very nearly idea-free. And Cruise,
perhaps sensing the futility, squeezes out one of his pummeling
performances, all veins and sweat, and it doesn't work. Cruise has grown as
an actor, but this is a step back to the grim Born on the Fourth of July
days. I don't want to pin the burden of blame on him I'd rather blame
Crowe but like Ben Stiller says: "It's Tom's world we just live in it.
Christopher Hickman (hickatz at mindspring dot com)