back to flak's homepage
spacer
spacer
FEATURES

Archives
Submissions

THE 1990s IN POLITICS

Introduction

1991 | Clay Risen

1992 | James Norton

1993 | Clay Risen

1994 | James Norton

1995 | Clay Risen

1996 | James Norton

1997 | Clay Risen

1998 | James Norton

1999 | Clay Risen

2000 | James Norton

The Decade in Books

The Decade in Film

The Decade in Music

RECENTLY IN FEATURES

The Collections of Barbara Bloom
by Abbey Nova

Cut to Fit in Shenzhen
by James Roth

Chinese Voices in the Wake of "314"
by Yongming Han

The Newsoleum Buries the Lede
by David Essex

The View From Havana
by Patrick Burns

Maxgate
by Neil Fitzgerald

On the Making of a Rap Song
by Cal Newport

Edwards Caucus? He Hardly Knew Us!
by Stephen Himes

The Creators of Nathan Barley
by Matthew Phelan

Adam Rust: The Interview
by James Norton

More Features ›

FEATURES WRITERS WANTED

Flak seeks writers to write reviews, essays and interviews for its Features section. Special emphasis on short, timely takes on major works.

No pay. Some glory. Lots of editorial back-and-forth, and a nice-looking clip for your files. Check out our guidelines for details or contact Features editor Jim Norton.



ABOUT FLAK

Help wanted: Winter Intern

About Flak
Archives
Letters to Flak
Submissions
Rec Reading
Rejected!

ALSO BY FLAK

Flak Sunday Comics
The Spam Blog
The Remote
Flak Print [6mb PDF]
Flak Daily Photo

SEARCH FLAK

flakmag.comwww
Powered by Google
MAILING LIST
Sign up for Flak's weekly e-mail updates:

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

spacer

Flak record The Decade in Politics
1999

The most recent period of anti-teen sentiment has been gaining ground ever since Nirvana made angst and conformist non-conformity cool again, but if you wanted to pick the one year that everything finally gelled, it would be 1999. It was the year of the Columbine shootings, the year of no-holds-barred reality television. The year of sex and violence on the Internet, the year of the slasher film.

It was also the year Generation Y began going to college; Generation Y the driven, fiscally conservative, socially liberal kids who mock their Gen X forebearers as slackers, all the while toiling away in parent-induced 18-hour days, going from school to soccer to band practice to tutoring sessions. Oddly, they are at once the product and the bane of late-model baby boomers, as it's in this stress-filled lifestyle that so many psychologists see the seed of explosive, Columbine-like behavior.

What's amazing is that none of these trends, taken by themselves, is new. School shootings, even white middle-class school shootings, have been going on for years. Violent video games are just this generation's Judas Priest and Metallica, pop-culture media thought to edge young boys toward violent behavior. And socially aspirant parents have always driven their kids to succeed. But it was 1999 that all the pieces of the teenager-as-deviant puzzle came together.

The contrast between 1999 and, say, 1993 is striking. When I was a junior in high school, black trenchcoats and moody demeanors may have marked you as a loser, but that was about it. Five years later, the same traits marked you as a nut-case and potential classroom assassin. Five years ago, you suffered the collective inattention of the school community; in a post-Columbine world all spotlights were on you. Whole new technologies of surveillance and deterrence were deployed against you, so that if you dared even to express a little anger about all this fuss it was your ass being hauled away.

Maybe the most ironic part of all this is that just as we are turning on the video cameras and metal detectors against teens, we are also cashing in on them. They may be a generation of guns and bombs, but they are also the generation of Britney Spears and Sony Playstations. They are the 1990s writ large, a decade of unprecedented economic optimism and consumer confidence, a decade of enormous cars and endless shopping.

In the end, you can't help but wonder if all of this isn't somehow insidiously related, if our belief that money can buy everything, even better kids, isn't somehow directly responsible for the occasional violent lash out. Or, more fittingly, whether the kids are all right after all, and it's the parents, the slave-driving Ivy-League-seeking parents who act more like secretaries or publicity agents than loving caretakers, who, in the end, bear the blame.

Clay Risen (clay@flakmag.com)

ALSO BY …

Also by Clay Risen:
After the Quake
Austerlitz
Blood of Victory
Bobos In Paradise
The Book of Illusions
Censored 2000
Choke
Communazis
Defying Hitler
The Dying Animal
Gig
More by Clay Risen ›

 
spacer
spacer

All materials copyright © 1999-2007 by Flak Magazine

spacer